You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With an Archer C7 v2 the list shows up the noise level in the associated stations doesn't show up, instead it shows 0dBm and the bar icon shows empty bars. The noise level is display correctly inside the wifi configuration under the device options.
This only happens at least with the channel 112, I have tried all the channels below from 36-104 (44 and 108 jumps to 48 and 112 respectively because other nearly stations).
Can't try the 4 channels above because radars and the next 4 above because in my country doesn't exist channel 144.
I will try to test with less width than 80 MHz.
I set it to low because it seems that it only affect to the associated stations tables visualization and the wifi network works as it should.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is strange, I have test just now at 20 MHz all the channels from 36 - 112, and only 36 shown up the noise level in the associated stations, but, just one time, I set up channel 36 a second time and it doesn't shown the noise level.
I have found also that the 5 GHz Ratio TX is always "6.0 Mbit/s, 20MHz" for all the clients, only the Ratio RX changes based on the data transferred between clients and the router. Perhaps is an ath10k issue and not a LuCI one.
howl:
With an Archer C7 v2 the list shows up the noise level in the associated stations doesn't show up, instead it shows 0dBm and the bar icon shows empty bars. The noise level is display correctly inside the wifi configuration under the device options.
This only happens at least with the channel 112, I have tried all the channels below from 36-104 (44 and 108 jumps to 48 and 112 respectively because other nearly stations).
Can't try the 4 channels above because radars and the next 4 above because in my country doesn't exist channel 144.
I will try to test with less width than 80 MHz.
I set it to low because it seems that it only affect to the associated stations tables visualization and the wifi network works as it should.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: