Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FS#375 - Bulidbots should have multilib support installed to prevent unnecessary breakage #5404

Open
openwrt-bot opened this issue Jan 8, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels
flyspray toolchain pull request/issue with toolchain related changes

Comments

@openwrt-bot
Copy link

diizzyy:

I've run into this earlier myself and now we are seeing at least one package failing because of it.
openwrt/packages#2823

People seem to have run into this issue before since it's listed as a requirement for Ubuntu 64-bit as an example.
https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/buildroot.exigence#examples_of_package_installations

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

diizzyy:

"The GNU Makefile-based build system allows cross-compiling on any host for any supported target, as long as both architectures have the same pointer size. If you want to cross-compile to any 32 bit target on an x64 OS, you need to install the multilib development package (e.g. libc6-dev-i386 on Debian/Ubuntu) and build a 32 bit host part (HOST_CC="gcc -m32")."

http://luajit.org/install.html

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

yousong:

The issue extends to "prerequisites for buildbot hosts". It also applies to java-related packages: openwrt/packages#3686

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

danham:

prerequisites for buildbot hosts

@aparcar aparcar added the toolchain pull request/issue with toolchain related changes label Feb 22, 2022
@f00b4r0
Copy link
Contributor

f00b4r0 commented Dec 2, 2022

@aparcar none, I'm not able to evaluate the implications

@f00b4r0
Copy link
Contributor

f00b4r0 commented Jan 1, 2024

This issue was handled in openwrt/buildbot#7 and can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flyspray toolchain pull request/issue with toolchain related changes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants