You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using the latest build OpenWrt 18.06.1 r7258-5eb055306f / LuCI openwrt-18.06 branch (git-18.284.42397-55ebe88)
With ZBT-WG3526 (16M), MediaTek MT7621 ver:1 eco:3.
I've VLANs for VoIP and IPTV.
If I enable Routing/NAT Offloading (tried both options (software and hardware), it looks that this feature doesn't allows the VoIP and IPTV traffic to work as it was doing previously.+
I know this is experimental and may be still needs some more testing, etc., but I just wanted to let the developers know about this issue, in case, they haven't realized it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You can use flow offloading ONLY for specific VLAN as a workaround. iptables -A forwarding_rule -i <lan_if> -o <wan_if> -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j FLOWOFFLOAD --hw
ip6tables -A forwarding_rule -i <lan_if> -o <wan_if> -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j FLOWOFFLOAD --hw
It looks like that this works, but now I discovered that IPv6 is not offloaded (tried this and the default options in Luci for the routing/NAT Offloading.
To make sure, I'm testing with this environment with iperf3:
host client - LAN of MT7621 device - WAN - host server
Host and Server have addresses from the same /48, different /64 subnets.
Top among both shows no CPU/IRQ utilization for IPv4, but high levels for IPv6.
IPv4 can do 933 Mbits/sec, but IPv6 is only doing 700-800.
jordipalet:
I'm using the latest build OpenWrt 18.06.1 r7258-5eb055306f / LuCI openwrt-18.06 branch (git-18.284.42397-55ebe88)
With ZBT-WG3526 (16M), MediaTek MT7621 ver:1 eco:3.
I've VLANs for VoIP and IPTV.
If I enable Routing/NAT Offloading (tried both options (software and hardware), it looks that this feature doesn't allows the VoIP and IPTV traffic to work as it was doing previously.+
I know this is experimental and may be still needs some more testing, etc., but I just wanted to let the developers know about this issue, in case, they haven't realized it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: