Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FS#1678 - TP-Link TL-WR1043ND #7942

Closed
openwrt-bot opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

FS#1678 - TP-Link TL-WR1043ND #7942

openwrt-bot opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@openwrt-bot
Copy link

StephanRichter:

Device:

  • TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v3, also reported for v1

Software:

  • LEDE Reboot 17.01.4 r3560-79f57e422d / LuCI lede-17.01 branch (git-17.290.79498-d3f0685)

Steps to reproduce:

  • Flash Router with LEDE
  • Setup Wifi
    • Interface Settings:
      • Mode: Access Point
      • Network: lan
      • Hide ESSID: no
      • WMM Mode: yes
      • Encryption: WPA2-PSK (Cipher: auto, set Key)
      • no MAC Filter
      • no advanced Settings
    • Advanced Settings:
      • Country Code: DE

Expected Behaviour:

  • Clients may connect to Wifi and access Local Network and Internet (if set up)

Actual Behavior:

  • works in the first place
  • Wifi becomes unusable within 24 hours (sometimes only minutes after setup, sometimes after hours)
    • no disconnection
    • ping times go up
    • package losses
  • reboot of device fixes problem for short time

More Information:

Possibly related Bug reports:

  • [[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=801|801]]
  • [[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1180|1180]]
  • [[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1373|1373]]
  • [[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1582|1582]]
@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

jow-:

Thanks for the report but why didn't you comment on one of the related bugs? Instead of four "random ath9k wifi issues" bugs we know have five...

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

psyborg:

[[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=801|801]] device use ath10k driver
[[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1373|1373]] device use rt2x00 driver
[[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1582|1582]] device use marvell driver

so, completely unrelated

[[https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1180|1180]] already contains possible solution, have you tried it?

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

StephanRichter:

@Jo-Philipp Wich: because I was not sure, whether it is the same bug. Obviously, some think it is not. Usually Bugtrackers allow to merge issues?

@Psyborg: Yes, I have seen that these are different drivers. But the problem
described is very similar. Maybe it is not a problem with the driver (which would explain the different behaviours depending on configuration)? I'm not an expert, just a tought.
I also read the proposed workaround (it is not a real solution, is it?), but as I wrote, I'm not an expert. I have no clue how to "remove 305-ath9k-limit-retries-for-powersave-response-frames.patch" or what "by forcing ps=false" means.

Maybe someone can help me out here? If so, I'm willing to test if this works for me and report here.

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

StephanRichter:

I just noticed I forgot to mention the problem in the task title - is there a way to alter it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant