You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
this is a follow up to FS#1501, Hans patched the Tunnel Encapsulation Limit since my ISP (UnityMedia Germany) doesn't support it - but now the IPv4 connection speed is drastically lower then the native ipv6 connection (4.64Mbit/s vs 120Mbit/s).
I have noticed that for some reason the automatically created wan6_4 interface is not a member of any firewall zone. Maybe the problem?
Hans was unable to reproduce the speed problems, I am willing to do some testing if directed. Since I am able to use my providers dual stack and lite tunnel as wished, I can compare speeds.
Supply the following if possible:
Device problem occurs on
I am using a Linksys WRT 3200 ACM
Software versions of OpenWrt/LEDE release, packages, etc.
latest official snapshot images and latest userland available
Steps to reproduce
a cable network provider which offers ds-lite tunnels -> after installing snapshot and packages, remove the wan interface and reboot - dslite interface is automatically created by the dslite proto script -> (uci set network.wan6.encaplimit_dslite=ignore; uci commit; reboot) -> working ipv4 ds-lite tunnel -> speedtest plus general surfing experience outside of ipv6 capable networks are horrible
Best regards,
Tim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
TimB87:
Hey everybody,
this is a follow up to FS#1501, Hans patched the Tunnel Encapsulation Limit since my ISP (UnityMedia Germany) doesn't support it - but now the IPv4 connection speed is drastically lower then the native ipv6 connection (4.64Mbit/s vs 120Mbit/s).
I have noticed that for some reason the automatically created wan6_4 interface is not a member of any firewall zone. Maybe the problem?
Hans was unable to reproduce the speed problems, I am willing to do some testing if directed. Since I am able to use my providers dual stack and lite tunnel as wished, I can compare speeds.
Supply the following if possible:
I am using a Linksys WRT 3200 ACM
latest official snapshot images and latest userland available
a cable network provider which offers ds-lite tunnels -> after installing snapshot and packages, remove the wan interface and reboot - dslite interface is automatically created by the dslite proto script -> (uci set network.wan6.encaplimit_dslite=ignore; uci commit; reboot) -> working ipv4 ds-lite tunnel -> speedtest plus general surfing experience outside of ipv6 capable networks are horrible
Best regards,
Tim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: