Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FS#1600 - Switch configuration missing for Tp-Link Archer C25 #8050

Closed
openwrt-bot opened this issue Jun 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

FS#1600 - Switch configuration missing for Tp-Link Archer C25 #8050

openwrt-bot opened this issue Jun 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@openwrt-bot
Copy link

dchollet:

I have two Tp-Link routers, Archer C59 and Archer C25.

Both of them are using trunk builds and running very well.

The only problem is with Archer C25 Switch configuration.
There are no menu option to configure switch in Luci. And when adding it manually on /etc/network it keeps complaining “Switch has an unknown topology - the VLAN settings might not be accurate."

Doing a fast research, noticed the /etc/board.json file for Archer C25 has missing entries for Switch configuration.
When the missing entries are added to /etc/board.json (from Archer C59) everything works fine.

May be the problem is a wrong entry in /etc/board.d/02_network, because archer-c25-v1 was included together with very different routers (Ex. tl-wr710n, wich has very different switch layout)

May be putting archer-c25-v1 to share archer-c58-v1, archer-c59-v1 or archer-c60-v1 section solves the problem, because they share very similar hardware.

My workaround now is to use Archer C59 switch configuration, but the configuration must be done every time after firmware upgrade.

Could you fix this please?

Thanks in advance

Daniel

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

jow-:

Hi, can you please describe the relation of the external case labels to the internal swconfig port numbers?

On the Archer C58 and C59 it is internal 1, 2, 3, 4 vs. case 1, 4, 3, 2 while on the C60 internal and externally printed port numbers match.

I wonder if one of these mappings is correct for the C25 or if we need a third one.

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

dchollet:

Thanks for the quick answer!
Just made some tests with swconfig now and we really have a third one!

Mapping for Archer C25 is: Case: 1, 2, 3, 4 vs Internal 4, 3, 2, 1
Exactly reversed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant